 |
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Lex Naturae
> Article 16
 |
II. Small Object Axioms |
|
| 2.1 Foundation Axioms | ||
| Article 16-Kinesis, Kinetic States | ||
| Canon 362 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of IONIZED FIELD STATE are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of IONIZED FIELD is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. IONIZED FIELD is equivalent to non-orbit MOTION. Therefore IONIZED FIELD is equivalent to the RELATIVE IONIZED NON-ORBIT MOTION of particles around an OBJECT. | ||
| 3. IONIZED FIELD MOTION is equivalent to the MOTION of NON-EQUATORIAL DESTRUCTIVE ATTRACTOR UNITA. Therefore IONIZED FIELD MOTION is equivalent to the MOTION of GRAVITY. Therefore IONIZED FIELD MOTION is equivalent to the MOTION of SPACE. | ||
| 4. IONIZED FIELD MOTION is equivalent to RESISTANCE of MOTION that is not HARMONIC. Therefore IONIZED FIELDS are RELATIVE. | ||
| 5. IONIZED FIELD MOTION for SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS and greater are subject to ENTROPY. | ||
| 6. IONIZED FIELD MOTION for the ATOMIC LEVEL of MATTER is equivalent to a TIME STATE of IONIZED Electrical Fields. | ||
| 7. When an IONIZED FIELD of particles interacts with MATTER is therefore induce POLARIZATION thus a transfer of ERGONS and ENERGIS takes place. | ||
| 8. An IONIZED FIELD is equivalent to ONE (1) FIELD. | ||
| 9. The STRUCTURE of an IONIZED FIELD is GEOMETRIC which is equivalent to DENSITY and VOLUME. Therefore IONIZED FIELDS may be calculated using EIKOS. | ||
| Canon 363 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of KINETIC ENERGIS LIMIT are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of KINETIC ENERGIS LIMIT is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. The maximum potential rate of kinetic.energis of an object (e.g. proton) is limited to the maximum rate of kinetic.energis (velocity) of its relative benchmark object (e.g. photon). | ||
| 3. The minimum potential rate of kinetic.energis of an object (e.g. proton) is limited to the minimum rate of kinetic.energis (velocity) of its relative benchmark object (e.g. photon). | ||
| Canon 364 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of KINETIC HARMONIC RATIO are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of KINETIC HARMONIC RATIO is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. The closer objects come in terms of distance (DENSITY), the greater their FREQUENCY and the slower their VELOCITY. | ||
| 3. The more distant objects separate (lower DENSITY), the lower their FREQUENCY and the greater their individual VELOCITY. | ||
| 4. All change in MOTION between changes in HARMONIC KINESIS and VELOCITY are conserved. | ||
| Canon 365 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of KINETIC MASS PARADOX are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of KINETIC MASS PARADOX is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. When the MASS of an OBJECT is greater than the MASS of its BENCHMARK object, its STRUCTURAL KINESIS shall INCREASE and its FREQUENCY and VELOCITY shall decrease. | ||
| 3. When the MASS of an OBJECT is smaller than the MASS of its BENCHMARK object, its STRUCTURAL KINESIS shall DECREASE and its FREQUENCY and VELOCITY shall increase. | ||
| 4. When the MASS of an OBJECT is greater than the MASS of its BENCHMARK object, it has greater perceived KINESIS, therefore greater perceived ENERGY. | ||
| 5. When the MASS of an OBJECT is smaller than the MASS of its BENCHMARK object, it has less perceived KINESIS, therefore less perceived ENERGY. | ||
| Canon 366 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of KINETIC TRANSFER are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of KINETIC TRANSFER is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. KINETIC TRANSFER is equivalent to VELOCITY changing in state to FREQUENCY which in turn may change state to HARMONIC KINESIS which in turn may change VELOCITY which in turn may change FREQUENCY such that total KINESIS always equals one (1). | ||
| Canon 367 | ||
| The axioms within the Class of Natural Law of KINETIC RESULT are: | ||
| 1. The axiom class of KINETIC RESULT is derived from the existence of Can.314-(Existence), Can.319-(UNITA Elements) , Can.320-(UNITA Properties), Can.378-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC ELEMENTS) and Can.379-(SUPER SUB ATOMIC PROPERTIES). | ||
| 2. KINETIC RESULT is equivalent to the KINETIC TRANSFER of KINESIS at one point in TIME compared the KINETIC TRANSFER of KINESIS at another point of time. | ||
| 3. When the VELOCITY of an OBJECT changes from TIME point 1 to TIME point 2, the total KINESIS of the object does not change. | ||
| 4. In a simple two object model, the relative kinetic result is always balanced as equal and opposite action and reaction. | ||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved.
|
||