 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 113
 |
IV. Consensus |
|
| 4.2 Consensus Consideration | ||
| Article 113-Trilateral Consensus | ||
| Canon 2194 | ||
| Trilateral Consensus is a term describing the third of three forms of concord of Consent between the minds of one or more persons concerning one or more Acts regarding certain Property or Rights the Divine Mind and therefore also the Higher Mind and Lower Mind (also equivalent to Spirit, Mind and Flesh) – hence trilateral. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2195 | ||
| As Trilateral Consensus involves willing Consent of a Tribunal (Council) of Lower Mind, Higher Mind and Divine Mind, a Trilateral Consensus may apply to the aggregate minds of one or more persons. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2196 | ||
| Any form of concord between two or more parties where agreement by all parties is concluded by Willing Consent is a Trilateral Consensus. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2197 | ||
| A Trilateral Consensus must always include the expression and memorial of a sacred oath or vow to the Divine Creator regarding a positive pronouncement, thus bringing into focus the Divine Mind and consensus with the Unique Collective Awareness. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2198 | ||
| An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is an example of a Trilateral Consensus Instrument issued under a Trilateral Council of Lower Mind, Higher Mind and Divine Mind of one party and two witnesses. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2199 | ||
| The most common forms of Trilateral Consensus Instruments are charters, covenants, unions, treaties, wills and testaments and concordats. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2200 | ||
| In addition to the provisions of these Canons, what constitutes a valid Trilateral Consensus is determined by valid statute of a juridic person consistent with these Canons. However, the most common requirements of valid form for a Trilateral Consensus include (but are not limited to): | ||
| (i) Offer – That one party makes a Sufficient Offer by some Terms about some Valuable Consideration that the other Accepts; and | ||
| (ii) Valuable Consideration – Is the accumulative Property or Rights representing the subject of the Offer; and | ||
| (iii) Sufficiency – Is the relative weight and equality of what is offered by one party versus what is given as acceptance in return, so that such an exchange cannot be argued as artificial, “peppercorn” or grossly unfair; and | ||
| (iv) Oath/Vow-That there exists a sacred Oath or Vow that bind the Divine Mind to the terms of the Consensus; and | ||
| (v) Terms-Is that any conditions (terms) that exist are clearly stated in simple day-to-day language and that all parties have had reasonable time to read and review them; and | ||
| (vi) Full Disclosure-Is the obligation to report a change in the condition or status of some material element of the Consensus to other parties; and | ||
| (vii) Remedy- Is that within the Terms there is clear expression of what remedy all parties possess in the event of one or more breaches; and | ||
| (viii) Penalties- Is clear indication of any and all penalties and charges associated with any breach; and | ||
| (ix) Completeness – That the Instrument is complete and no part is missing; and | ||
| (x) Mutual Willing Acceptance- That evidence exists of Willing Consent that the Offer was accepted by all parties. | ||
|
||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||