 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 118
 |
IV. Consensus |
|
| 4.2 Consensus Consideration | ||
| Article 118-Offer | ||
| Canon 2225 | ||
| An Offer is an invitation to consent and enter into a binding Consensus communicated to another party which contains terms sufficiently definite to create an enforceable Consensus if the other party accepts the invitation. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2226 | ||
| The word Offer originates from ancient Latin offero meaning “to present, show, bring forward”. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2227 | ||
| An Offer must be first made before a Consensus can lawfully be accepted. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2228 | ||
| Mere recommendation of an article does not bind the vendor of it. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2229 | ||
| As the original and true definition of Judgment is to “bind together the mind (and person)”, all Judgments of the Court are an Offer requiring Consent, usually through the interpretation of absence of objection. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2230 | ||
| In the presence of a vocalized objection, non-consent or counter offer, a Judgment shall have no legal or lawful effect, regardless of what a Judge or Magistrate may claim. Upon appeal, such a Judgment must be rendered invalid and reparations made. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2231 | ||
| In the presence of a vocalized objection, non-consent or counter offer to a Judgment, by law an alternative Judgment must be offered by the Judge or Magistrate for a Consensus and therefore the Judgment to be valid. | ||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||