 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 130
 |
IV. Consensus |
|
| 4.3 Consensus Obligation | ||
| Article 130-Remedy | ||
| Canon 2295 | ||
| Remedy is a fictional concept in Reality whereby an Injured Party receives a form of cure, repair, correction, compensation and justice against an Injury in accordance with these canons and any valid statutes promulgated by valid Juridic Persons. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2296 | ||
| The damage, loss, violation or hurt to a physical object or concept under Natural Law itself does not automatically warrant Remedy as Remedy requires the pre-existence of a fictional framework under Positive Law prohibiting certain Actions, an Injured Form, an Accused Form and a lawful Ordinance against the Accused. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2297 | ||
| All Positive Law is by definition imperfect as it is made by men and women. Therefore, all Positive Law requires Remedy to offset its imperfect nature. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2298 | ||
| Failure to make public, easily obtainable, clear and concise the existence of Remedy and how it may be exercised is the same as if no valid Remedy exists at all. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2299 | ||
| The deliberate use of obscure or multiple meaning terms or the failure to express in simple language the function and process of a particular Remedy is the same as if no valid Remedy exists at all. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2300 | ||
| The absence of valid Remedy as part of any Positive Law negates its validity and renders such a law null and void from the beginning. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2301 | ||
| All Consensus requires valid Remedy. Therefore, the absence of valid Remedy negates the validity and enforceability of the particular Consensus. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2302 | ||
| Any Decree, Prescript, Rescript or Ordinance that is not in accordance with these Canons concerning Remedy is not a valid Statute, nor law but a false edict and therefore null and void from the beginning. | ||
|
||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||