 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 165
 |
V. Occurrence |
|
| 5.2 Fact | ||
| Article 165-Source | ||
| Canon 2492 | ||
| Source of Fact is the primary person, place, thing from which a Fact has come or is acquired. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2493 | ||
| When the source of a claimed Fact is obtained through documentation, it may be classed as a source text and such information must be referred by Citation. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2494 | ||
| There are three forms of source text being Primary, Secondary and Tertiary: | ||
| (i) A Primary Source Text is first hand written evidence and testimony made at the time of the events by an actor or witness to such events and whereby the provenance of such evidence is verifiable; and | ||
| (ii) A Secondary Source Text is written accounts of history based upon Primary Source Texts or a claimed reprint or approximate reproduction of an alleged Primary Source Text in which no Primary Source Text exists; and | ||
| (iii) A Tertiary Source Text is any compilation of Secondary Sources and excerpts from Primary Source Texts. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2495 | ||
| A Source Text cannot be considered to be a Primary Source Text if the text is a claimed reprint or approximate reproduction, or the text is derived from an extract of a Secondary Source Text to imply the existence of a Primary Source but the original is missing. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2496 | ||
| A Source Text cannot be considered to be a Secondary Source Text if the text is a claimed reprint or approximate reproduction, or the text is derived from an extract of a Tertiary Source Text to imply the existence of a Secondary Source but the original is missing. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2497 | ||
| A claimed Fact derived from a valid Primary Source Text shall always have higher standing than a claimed Fact derived from a Secondary Source Text. Similarly, a claimed Fact derived from a valid Secondary Source Text shall always have higher standing than a claimed Fact derived from a Tertiary Source Text. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2498 | ||
| As the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican, also falsely known as the Holy See did in part admit in its actions in Ecclesiae Christi [July 28, 1591] to the deliberate creation of false and fraudulent source texts including the destruction of countless true original source texts and the absurdity that such false and fraudulent documents are legally permitted to be argued as true and correct, all source texts originating from the Roman Cult, including all historic legal texts used by the Cult to claim their authority and position are hereby null and void from the beginning when they were first issued. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2499 | ||
| No source text deemed a fraud in part or whole, in accordance with these Canons may be used as a valid source text in Law. | ||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||