 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 176
 |
VI. Argument |
|
| 6.1 Argument | ||
| Article 176-Interpretation | ||
| Canon 2560 | ||
| Interpretation is the use of argument, reason, logic and competence in accordance with these canons to deduce the correct intent and meaning of the law. Thus, to interpret the law is to explain and apply The Law as it was originally intended. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2561 | ||
| The best interpreter of a valid canon is the canon itself. Therefore, the best interpretation of any administrative act, statute or ordinance is its conformity to these canons first and secondly to itself. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2562 | ||
| Conformity to these valid Canons, not use is the best interpreter of things. Therefore, custom alone is the worst interpreter of the law. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2563 | ||
| In the construction of valid agreements conforming to these canons, words are to be interpreted against the person using them. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2564 | ||
| Lawful commands in accordance with these canons receive a strict interpretation, but unlawful may command a broad and extended interpretation. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2565 | ||
| When anyone references, writes or speaks of “Interpretation”, “Valid Interpretation”, or “Correct Interpretation” it shall mean these canons and no other. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2566 | ||
| It is an invalid interpretation which corrupts the text of any canon. | ||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||