 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
you are here: > Canonum De Ius Positivum
> Article 184
 |
VI. Argument |
|
| 6.2 Logic | ||
| Article 184-Logic | ||
| Canon 2607 | ||
| Logic is a formal System of Argument based on the principles of Inference and Reason by which Propositions are properly expressed to achieve consistent Conclusions across a wide variety of Subjects. | ||
 |
||
| Canon 2608 | ||
| There are three (3) forms of valid Logic based on the approach to time and the chronology of events as well as the number of inputs (Propositions) and options of Conclusion being Bivalent Linear, Multivalent Linear and Multivalent Multilinear: | ||
| (i) Bivalent Linear Logic is based on the presumption of single chronological set of dependent time events and only one of two possible outcomes or Conclusions; and | ||
| (ii) Multivalent Linear Logic is based on the presumption of single chronological set of dependent time events and two or more possible outcomes or Conclusions; and | ||
| (iii) Multivalent Multilinear Logic is based on the presumption of a multiple set of interdependent time events and two or more possible outcomes or Conclusions; and | ||
|
||
| Canon 2609 | ||
| Only Multivalent Multilinear Logic is capable to approximating to any degree of accuracy the reality of Divine Law, Natural Law or Cognitive Law. Both Multivalent Linear Logic and Bivalent Linear Logic are wholly unable to accurately portray the reason, function and effect of any real world events with any degree of accuracy. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2610 | ||
| While Bivalent Linear Logic is the most unnatural system for portraying, recreating or analyzing the reason, cause and effect of any real world events, it is the most functional of all three logic models in terms of law because of its simplicity. Therefore, Bivalent Linear Logic is the foundation of all Positive Law or law derived from Positive Law. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2611 | ||
| As Bivalent Linear Logic is the most unnatural system for portraying, recreating or analyzing the reason, cause and effect of any real world events, it cannot be used in Law to describe Cognitive Law, Natural Law or Divine Law. Furthermore, Bivalent Linear Logic can only be applied to fictitious persons, not to actual men or women. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2612 | ||
| As Bivalent Linear Logic is wholly unnatural to the real world, all men and women must be granted the right of free will and consent to be adjudicated according to Bivalent Linear Logic through persons. | ||
|
||
| Canon 2613 | ||
| Bivalent Linear Logic is based on three (3) laws of reason being Identity, Non-Contradiction and Bivalency being: | ||
| (i) The Law of Identity states than object is the same as its identity; and | ||
| (ii) The Law of Non-Contradiction or the "exclusion of paradox" states that a valid proposition cannot state something that is and that is not in the same respect and at the same time; and | ||
| (iii) The Law of Bivalency (Excluded Middle) states that conclusions will resolve themselves to one of two states being valid or invalid. | ||
Copyright © ab initio One-Heaven.Org. All Rights reserved. |
||