II. Supernatural
2.2 Supernatural Entity
Article 33 - God
As valid Divine Law recognizes that life and existence is a dream in motion in accordance with the Canons of valid Natural Law, so long as a God is believed to exist and worshipped as existing, it has valid existence.
Belief, worship and subsequent existence of a God is separate to any claimed power or influence as attributes of a particular God. All spiritual forces remain subject to Divine Law and the limits of Natural Law.
In accordance with a particular faith, a god, or God may represent a spiritual force of supreme goodness, sanctity and holiness, a spiritual force of great destruction, negativity and ill intent, or possessing a duality personality of both good and evil. The term god and even God do not indicate whether a deity is a divine positive or a divine malevolent being.
When the term god is qualified as Lord God, then this unmistakably implies a supreme malevolent force as the term Lord is historically reserved and synonymous with “Ba’al” as the “Master of the slaves” in direct contradiction to a benevolent supreme being.
Any religion that worships a God whereby the followers are forced to depreciate themselves and all other Homo Sapiens as “sheep” or other form of animals absolutely implies a God representing a malevolent supreme being as such belief is contradictory to all valid Divine Law, Natural Law and Positive Law.
By definition, any God that demonstrates or professes negative emotions such as jealousy such as “I am a jealous God”, hate or anger is a malevolent spirit, less than the absolute Divine Creator. Jealousy implies a lesser perceived status of self compared to some equal or higher being.
As existence depends upon the immutability of valid Natural Law, no spiritual force, including the Absolute, the one, the ALL can abrogate, suspend or change a single Natural Law without causing the collective dream of existence to collapse. Therefore, no God possesses the power to abrogate, suspend or change any valid Natural Law.
By definition, the claimed existence of one set of emotions and morals as attributes to a Supreme God necessarily implies the existence of the opposite set of emotions and morals as the existence of one depends upon the existence of the other. Therefore, to claim a Supreme God expresses love is to imply the same Supreme God expresses hate. The only other possible explanation is two separate and lesser deities – one good and one evil – which implies the claim a God is also the Supreme Being is a deliberate fraud.
Any religion that professes allegiance to a Supreme God they claim expresses emotions such as love and compassion, including moral judgments without also admitting such a Supreme Being by their own admissions must also be supremely hateful and immoral is a fraud of logic and concealment, with any such scripture and teachings null and void from the beginning.
By definition, the claimed existence of a Supreme God separate in some way and above the realm of morals and emotions does not imply a dual personality, but a whole. Therefore, such a Supreme God expresses neither love, nor hate only existence and awareness.