VII.   Law

Jurisdiction is the Authority, claimed Rights and Powers of one (1) or more Officials to review, administer and issue certain Decrees, Prescripts, Statutes or Ordinances for a given Juridic Person or Society. Jurisdiction most frequently applies to the Authority of a Court to hear and adjudicate a matter, particularly in the valid publication of Ordinances.

The word Jurisdiction comes from combing two (2) ancient Latin words iuro meaning “to swear, make an oath” and dicio meaning “power, influence, authority of word; to speak, toargue”. Therefore, Jurisdiction by definition is dependent upon the making of a sacred oath associated with speech or argument first before “some authority or power capable of determining the validity of such speech or argument”.

By definition, any Official who refuses to produce their oath and be bound by it, has no Jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction always rests on Authority first, Power second and any claimed Rights last.

A Juridic Person having lesser Authority than another has no Jurisdiction over the other, regardless of any Power or claimed Rights.

Under Roman Law, also known as Roman Cult Law, Common Law, Private International Law and Civil Law, there exists three (3) essential forms of Jurisdiction founded each on specific claims of Rights being Personal, Territorial and Subject Matter:

(i) Personal Jurisdiction is claimed authority through jus in rem by claimed customary (Roman) law through lex situs (law of the place in which the property is situated) over a person, often regardless of their location; and

(ii) Territorial Jurisdiction is claimed authority through jus gentium by claimed customary (Roman) law through lex loci (law of the place) confined to a bounded space, including all those (persons) residing therein and any events which occur there; and

(iii) Subject - Matter Jurisdiction (subjectum) is claimed authority jus in personam through claimed customary (Roman) law through lex specialis (law governing a specific subject matter) over the subject of the legal questions involved in the suit.

Under the Roman system, the claims of Personal Jurisdiction, Territorial Jurisdiction, Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is the attempt to "perfect Jurisdiction" based on occult ecclesiastical belief that each represents an element of a "Divine indenture" being the soul, body and mind respectively and when present, make any decision of the court "lawful" under Divine Law.

Under the Roman system, the claims of jus in rem, jus gentium, jus in personam is the attempt to "perfect Jurisdiction" based on claimed Jurisdiction over one's soul, body and mind respectively:

(i) jus in rem as Personal Jurisdiction is claimed "ownership" of the soul and name by ownership of the record of birth and existence of the birth certificate proving the ritual of "baptism" of salvaging the soul took place in a hospital. Furthermore, the existence of the Cestui Que Vie Trusts is proof of the "property" of the name and therefore "soul" owned by the Roman Cult and its partners; and

(ii) jus gentium as Territorial Jurisdiction is claimed "ownership" of the flesh via the Live Birth Record of the baby being conveyed as "property" into one (1) of the three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts and a bond then issued against it and"sold" to the respective privately owned central bank of the state secretly making each and every citizen a privately owned "slave"; and

(iii) jus in personam as Subject Matter Jurisdiction is claimed "ownership" of the mind by consent via the acceptance of benefits and the existence of social security, health benefits, drivers license and other documentary proof of consent to be "under" the jurisdiction of the Roman court.

Under the occult ecclesiastical beliefs of the Roman Cult that underpin the principles of "perfected Jurisdiction" of Roman Courts, failure to gain consent of the mind means failure to control all three (3) forms of property (soul, body and mind). However, in recent years Roman courts largely ignore this necessity and proceed on the false presumption that consent was given even if it was openly denied.

In accordance with Ucadian Law, these Canons and the Covenant of One Heaven, also known as Pactum De Singularis Caelum, there exists three (3) essential forms of Jurisdiction founded on specific Authority, claimed Rights and Powers being in order Divine, Society and Consent:

(i) Divine Jurisdiction is claimed authority through jus divinum by Pactum De Singularis Caelum and Canonum De Lex Divina concerning a member of One Heaven, often regardless of their location; and

(ii) Society Jurisdiction is claimed authority through jus civitatis by Canonum De Ius Positivum confined to a bounded space, including all those (persons) residing therein and any events which occur there; and

(iii) Consent Jurisdiction is claimed authority jus consensum by Canonum De Ius Cogitatum through consent of the parties over the subject of the legal questions involved in the case.

The Society of One Heaven, also known as the First See, also known as the Holly See and True Holy See, also known as Heaven, is judged by no one.  

Jurisdiction presumed by claimed "rights" such as jus in rem, jus in personam and jus gentium have no force nor effect when challenged by superior claims of rights and title.

It is solely the right of the Supreme Court of One Heaven to adjudicate all matters, cases, statutes and Form in accordance with these Canons and the sacred covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum.