Canonum De Ius Positivum
Canons of Positive Law

one heaven iconIII.   Rights

3.2 Rights Administration

Article 97 - Location Trust

Canon 2001 (link)

A Location Trust is a valid aggregate Superior Trust registered into the Great Register and Public Record of a Civil Ucadian Society. A Location Trust holds Real Property pertaining to Land and associated immovables and movables. A Location Trust is always a Superior Trust and can never be a True Trust.

Canon 2002 (link)

As Land is physical matter within space existing in accordance with Natural Law, it cannot be “owned” by a fiction such as an owner, or trust. Therefore, in order to enable lawful “ownership” of Land, a valid fictional form derived from the objective existence of Land is required. This fiction is called “Location”.

Canon 2003 (link)

A Location is a valid survey of the Land and the creation of its metes and bounds so that the description is consistent with an unbroken succession of surveys from the accurate survey of Divine Law down to the Cadastral Location survey.

Canon 2004 (link)

Neither Torrens Title nor incomplete and inferior claims of survey may be used as valid arguments for succession in defining a valid Location.

Canon 2005 (link)

A Location Trust is equivalent in name only to a Land Trust, also known as Land Title.

Canon 2006 (link)

A Location Trust is not equivalent to Estate based Land Title and Rights, particularly Real Estate. Real Estate is the first right of use within the Estate, whereas Real property is first Right of use by Divine Right, above all other claims.

Canon 2007 (link)

All Land Title based upon an Estate and therefore Testamentary Trust is by logic and reason inferior to any Land Title based upon Real Property.

Canon 2008 (link)

As all Land Title based on Real Estate is inferior to Land Title based on Real Property, all associated claimed liens, easements and conditions of Title have no lawful or material effect.

Canon 2009 (link)

A new Location Trust is formed when one or more True Persons holding various contested or agreed Rights such as Ownership, Occupation, Possession and Location agree to form a new Trust by conveying and combining these rights under Deed and Title. The perfection of these various Rights then determines the status of the Title of the Location Trust.

Canon 2010 (link)

There are only four types of status of a Title concerning a Location Trust: Perfect, Clear, Contested and Provisional.

Canon 2011 (link)

A Perfect Title for a Location Trust is when the True Persons hold proof of Right of Ownership, Occupies the Land and a valid Ucadian Society conveys Right of Location into the new Trust perfecting Title.

Canon 2012 (link)

A Clear Title for a Location Trust is when the True Persons hold proof of Right of Ownership, but do not occupy the land and a valid Ucadian Society conveys Right of Location into the new Trust clearing the Title.

Canon 2013 (link)

A Contested Title for a Location Trust is when the True Persons Occupy the Land, but their proof or Right of Ownership is contested by another True Person, therefore suspending the conveyance of the Rights of Location into the new Trust until the controversy is resolved.

Canon 2014 (link)

A Provisional Title for a Location Trust is when the True Persons Occupy the Land, they have made improvements to the land, they claim their Right of Ownership through Possession and abandonment or non-use by the owner, they have defined a Location survey but neither the survey has been validated against all valid Land Titles nor has the Owner not had time to lodge an objection. Thus the conveyance of the Rights of Location into the new Trust is suspended until a period of time for the owner to object.

Canon 2015 (link)

In matters of dispute, a Perfect Title is always superior to a Clear Title and a Clear Title is always superior to a Contested Title or Provisional Title.

Canon 2016 (link)

The assertion and enforcement of a claim by an inferior juridic person through inferior Estate title against a superior person and Real Property ownership constitutes a gross injury and fraud against the law, with no lawful form other than the rule of force.

Canon 2017 (link)

Any inferior juridic person or inferior person that participates in gross fraud against the law by asserting inferior rights over lawfully superior rights accepts and consents personally to the full liability of their actions including the pursuit of maximum punishment and penalty against them at the earliest opportunity.