Print this page
  The Biggest Lies used to ignore Ecclesiastical Deeds are desperate, unlawful, corrupt and criminal methods employed by Roman agents, members of the Bar Society/Associations and others in their attempt to ignore the absolute fact that before Heaven and Earth they have been served Divine Notice through one or more Ecclesiastical Deeds because of their unwillingness to honor basic rights bestowed to all men, women and children by the Divine since being born.  
Lie#1 I Don't understand, I have no idea what you're talking about  
Lie#2 It won't work. It's not the law/correct procedure  
Lie#3 Sending a Blood Seal thumbprint is unlawful or health hazard  
Lie#4 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is unlawful, you need a signature  
Lie#5 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is a criminal threat  
Lie#6 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is a terrorist act  
Lie#7 Your have no authority to send an Ecclesiastical Deed  
Lie#8 There are no Trusts, you need a Psychiatric Evaluation  
Lie#9 There are no Cestui Que Vie Trusts, you need help  
Lie#10 Your Ecclesiastical Deed(s) is rejected and therefore null  
Lie#11 Your Ecclesiastical Deed(s) is ineffective because you didn't follow the correct procedure  
Lie#12 You have no idea of the law, you need a psych evaluation  
   
Lie#1 I Don't understand, I have no idea what you're talking about  
Lie I don't understand this (Ecclesiastical Deed Poll). I've never seen anything like this before in law. I don't know what you're talking about.  
Truth Deed Polls have been around for centuries and whilst being a  
Answer    
  Thank you for your admission. Just to be clear you are saying you don’t understand the fundamental principles of law that underpin trust law, deeds and contracts?  
  On the basis you have admitted on record not to be competent in considering what is an instrument created from the fundamental principles of law that underpin trust law, deeds and contracts and given you are holding fiduciary positions concerning trusts that are impeeding my rights, I ask that you provide the name of a competent trustee to whom I may serve this (EDP ) instrument.  
   
Lie#2 It won't work. It's not the law/correct procedure  
  Is that you professional legal opinion? If so, I request that you provide this to me in writing immediately so that I may send your professional opinion through to the Attorney General in denying the receipt of a lawfully constructed ecclesiastical deed.  
  If you refuse to provide your statement in writing, then I can only conclude that such statements were designed to either deliberately obstruct or deceive which is a serious injury to fair justice, in which case I shall be writing to the Attorney General on the record so that what you have done is recorded as evidence and proof of your dishonor and why the Deed Poll is necessary.  
   
Lie#3 Sending a Blood Seal thumbprint is unlawful or health hazard  
  As the Blood Seal Thumbprint is completely sealed in tape/firm plastic and was checked as being firmly sealed before posting/service, it cannot be exposed to the atmosphere or exposure to contact with human skin unless the tape or plastic is deliberately removed by one of your officials, which constitutes deliberate tampering.  
  This means only two possible conclusions can be made by your initial claim: (1) either your accusation of the Blood Seal Thumprint is a mistake based on incomplete or erroneous information in which case I ask that you correct the record and ensure the correct agents and principles receive the instrument or else (2) one or more of your officials has deliberately tampered with this deed and official posted material rendering it hazardous which constitutes possible criminal conduct.  
  Please confirm which one of these two conclusions are correct immediately.  
   
Lie#4 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is unlawful, you need a signature  
  It is a long standing ancient and universally accepted custom of law in all countries, including this one, that a testator or grantor signature on a deed may take the form of his full name, nickname, initials, or other identifying mark, including a thumbprint or blood splotch. This long standing custom is also protected within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The reason for this long standing custom is that in several activities of government administration a similar process is undertaken such as taking a blood splotch of the babies blood onto a signed live birth record instead of the ink foot prints of the baby as an endorsed original recognized as having great value within the system.  
  Section 3-401(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides that "[n]o person is liable on an instrument unless his signature appears thereon." The UCC defines the term signature as any name, trade name, assumed name, word, or other identifying mark used in lieu of a signature (§ 3-401(2)). The term signed is defined by the UCC as any symbol executed or adopted by a party with the "present intention of authenticating a writing" (§ 1-201(39)). Thus, commercial instruments, such as deeds, checks and promissory notes, may be signed by affixing any symbol that an individual intends to represent his signature.  
  In claiming that the Blood Seal thumbprint is unlawful is this court seeking to overturn existing statutes, customs, case law and doctrine and form a new precedent. If so, can this please be confirmed in writing immediately by a competent judge or judicial official. If such confirmation is not received in writing within three days, then it shall be interpreted in favor of the objection being a mistake of law and the Deed shall be represented.  
   
Lie#5 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is a criminal threat  
  The Instrument(s) in question is/are a solemn signed, sealed and delivered Ecclesiastical Deed evoking certain gifts, grants and conveyances upon the failure of one or more Executors and Administrators to perform their fiduciary duties mandated by law. Therefore unless the court officials are suggesting that valid commercial and legal instruments are now somehow to be regarded as criminal threats, therefore placing all persons, aggregate and entities, including the court itself into a class of alleged offenders, such claims are absurd and clearly false.  
  The lawful demand for an officer invested with certain fiduciary obligations to do their duty can never be validly considered either a crime nor a threat unless such officers with the tacit support of others wish to pervert and subvert the very foundations of law which underpin all societies possessing a system of positive law.  
  If this is the intention of the court officials in question, can this claim be placed in writing so that an immediate appeal and notification be made to the highest legal representatives of the nation, with the documentary evidence provided that these court officials now wish to disregard the laws of the nation and act in their own regard, by their own rules, for their own benefit.  
   
Lie#6 Sending an Ecclesiastical Deed is a terrorist act  
  The Instrument(s) in question is/are a solemn signed, sealed and delivered Ecclesiastical Deed evoking certain gifts, grants and conveyances upon the failure of one or more Executors and Administrators to perform their fiduciary duties mandated by law. Therefore unless the court officials are suggesting that valid commercial and legal instruments are now somehow to be regarded as terrorist acts, therefore placing all persons, aggregate and entities, including the court itself into a class of alleged terrorists, such claims are absurd and clearly false.  
  The lawful demand for an officer invested with certain fiduciary obligations to do their duty can never be validly considered either a crime nor a terrorist threat unless such officers with the tacit support of others wish to pervert and subvert the very foundations of law which underpin all societies possessing a system of positive law.  
  If this is the intention of the court officials in question to abuse the memories of those killed by terrorists and pervert statutes intended to protect the nation, not hide incompetence, can this claim be placed in writing so that an immediate appeal and notification be made to the highest legal representatives of the nation, with the documentary evidence provided that these court officials now wish to disregard the laws of the nation and act in their own regard, by their own rules, for their own benefit.  
   
Lie#7 Your have no authority to send an Ecclesiastical Deed  
  The Divine Immortal Spirit expressed in trust to the circumscribed Living Flesh has every right to lawfully sign, seal and deliver an Ecclesiastical deed, by the very laws, concepts and principles that make all other deeds lawful or invalid.  
  As only the Divine can truly own property and all other rights are bestowed through valid representative of the Divine, the conveyance of property and creation of the deed is perfectly lawful.  
  As only an officer possessing valid ecclesiastical authority may seal a deed, the fact that the circumscribed living flesh is circumscribed means it is sanctified within its holy sanctuary, also known as its chapel, its chamber and office. Therefore the flesh holds a true office of ecclesiastical authority with which to sign, seal and execute such a sacred instrument.  
  If the court wishes to challenge the authority of Rome and the rest of the world concerning these ancient principles, can such objection be placed in writing in no less than three days so that it can be immediately provided to the highest legal authority in the nation, including the most senior representatives of the bar as well as the Catholic Church that these officials no longer wish to honor the principles by which all property and all deeds are founded?  
  If no written letter is provided, nor answer by the court given, then it will assumed as consent by the court for us to notify these officials that officials of this court consent to be known as defying the laws upon which all deeds and property is managed and for all to know that these principles no longer exist nor function within this county and state.  
   
Lie#8 There are no Trusts, you need a Psychiatric Evaluation  
  By stating there are no trusts in operation concerning my matter, (or by refusing to answer my direct and respectful question), it must be concluded that the court officials in question must also by definition be denying that they have ever seen any screen, print out or used any computer within the court house that links any of the numbers used concerning my matter with any software program displaying one or more accounts or one or more financial transactions.  
  The officials in question are asked to confirm these claims of denial in writing within three days that any trusts exist and that the court uses any computer system linking to trust accounts connected to the matters and this and other matters.  
  If such confirmation is not provided in writing on official court stationery within three days, then it shall be presumed that the claims of the court officials hold and official contact will be made with the Attorney General re-stating these claims and requesting they validate the truth of these claims after the court officials were respectfully requested to confirm or deny these claims.  
  Furthermore, if its proven that such trust accounts and trust exists and it can therefore be proven that these court officials deliberately and knowingly sought to pervert the court of justice, then every effort will be made with the highest courts and every avenue to have these matters dismissed and the officials in question suspended from the duties for such corrupt conduct, including the right to pursue damages caused by such injury to our trust property.  
   
Lie#9 There are no Cestui Que Vie Trusts  
  Then what kind of trust or trusts do exist? What are the fiduciary roles being held within the court, including trustee, any administrator or executor? Who authorized the creation of these trusts or trust? What property does the trust or trusts contain?  
  If these trusts relate to my person, or some benefit, why have I not been provided an accounting? If such failure to be notified of the existence of these trusts, no accounting and no disclosure of the roles of these court officials has occurred, why does not constitute fundamental breaches of fiduciary duty resulting in the negation of any claimed liability including the termination of officers capable of representing such offices?  
   
Lie#10 Your Ecclesiastical Deed(s) is rejected and therefore null  
  As The Ecclesiastical Deed was gifted, granted and conveyed by a Divine Immortal Spirit to circumscribed flesh that signed, sealed and delivered it by a blood seal as a Deed Poll executed upon receipt, by what Ecclesiastical Authority do you claim the Deed is rejected?  
  If you refuse to explain by what Ecclesiastical Authority and power you claim the deed is rejected, then such claims must be immediately interpreted as false misrepresentation, a fraud and a further dishonor resulting in the increase of any injury sought by three times.  
  Furthermore, you evidence of such grave dishonor by your envelope, or your handwritten dishonor provides irrefutable proof of your sin and supreme Ecclesiastical Dishonor.  
   
Lie#11 Your Ecclesiastical Deed(s) is ineffective because you didn't follow the correct procedure  
  The Divine Immortal Spirit expressed in trust to the circumscribed Living Flesh has every right to lawfully sign, seal and deliver an Ecclesiastical deed, by the very laws, concepts and principles that make all other deeds lawful or invalid.  
  As only the Divine can truly own property and all other rights are bestowed through valid representative of the Divine, the conveyance of property and creation of the deed is perfectly lawful.  
  As only an officer possessing valid ecclesiastical authority may seal a deed, the fact that the circumscribed living flesh is circumscribed means it is sanctified within its holy sanctuary, also known as its chapel, its chamber and office. Therefore the flesh holds a true office of ecclesiastical authority with which to sign, seal and execute such a sacred instrument.  
  Therefore, the deed provided complies to the founding principles of civilized law upon which all property law and contract law is based. Therefore no statute, order of any kind can logically exist that can stand negating the legitimacy of the Ecclesiastical Deed signed, sealed and delivered without also seeking to invalidate all other property law and contracts of the nation. Is this what the court is confirming now exists?  
  If you refuse to explain by what Authority and power you claim the deed is rejected on failed procedure, then such claims must be immediately interpreted as false misrepresentation, a fraud and a further dishonor resulting in the increase of any injury sought by three times.  
  Furthermore, you evidence of such grave dishonor by your envelope, or your handwritten dishonor provides irrefutable proof of your sin and supreme Ecclesiastical Dishonor.  
     
     
Copyright © One-Heaven.Org Ab Initio. All Rights Reserved