Print this page
  The Structure of the Law is the way the law of the court is formed, distinguished between different courts and how different forms of law may be invoked under certain rituals.  
     
  The “stacked” deck card game  
  No one seriously believes that winning is possible when the deck of cards is stacked against you, or the dice are loaded? To gamble in such circumstances where open corruption of the playing field would reduce the odds to a mere few percent would be insanity. Now consider if you were playing such games with such biased odds for your life and freedom?.  
  The private guild associations of the Bar have managed - through centuries of trickery and falsity - to make playing in their private (court) casinos of law compulsory where understanding even what kind of game you are playing, let alone the odds is more than half the battle.  
  At any given moment when one is forced to stand and provide a defense, or seek some redress for some injury, there are multiple forms of law operating at the same time. In fact, one court may choose to wholly alter the multiple forms of law by which it operates without giving full and transparent notice of the fact and 99% of people are none the wiser.  
  So how can one find any kind of remedy in private courts, run by a private guild, using their own private (Case law) laws? The answer is in understanding the way they structure their forms of law, how they structure their court and why.  
  There is no guarantee of “winning” with such knowledge. Indeed, there are many who have a degree in law and even “practice” law in the private courts who may never have heard of some of this knowledge. Yet, real and true knowledge is power – as it has always been known. Such knowledge therefore may help some or many of you to recognize exactly what is happening within these private commercial exchanges known as courts and why.  
   
  History provides provenance to the behaviour of today  
  Despite much that has been deliberate corrupted, even the history available in major city libraries and even online is sufficient for a competent researcher or inquisitive student to find and validate much of what is written within these pages.  
  When the trick of changing the form of court if performed by a judge and clerk leaving the court and a “recess” being offered rather than an adjournment, such “changing of court” can be found throughout history when the first forms of court such as the court of chancery, the court of common pleas and the court of the exchequer would tour each county of England at least twice a year from the 16th Century onwards, often meeting at the same hall, one after another. Yet for each of these courts, a different form of law existed and different outcomes proposed.  
  Indeed, when the first permanent and purpose built court houses were erected in regional centres from the late 18th and then 19th centuries, the generic court played host to these ancient courts and modern variations and hybrids, but with less pomp and circumstance between their differences.  
  All that has happened is that the historic fact of different forms of court meeting in the same physical court has been brought forward so that the obvious announcement of one form of court transitioning to another has been minimized to only a handful of signals such as announcing a “recess” instead of an “adjournment: and the arrival of a different clerk into the court, rather than formal offer and notice.  
  So why is there such ignorance by the general membership of the Bar- the lawyers and attorneys- as to what is physically happening when a judge chooses to run out of court at the first sign they are dishnonor? The simple answer is that they have been deliberately taught in ignorance – procedure and process over substance of the law. They have been taught the essence of lares, or “customary law and ritual” rather than lore/lex “rhetoric or argument of law”.  
     
  The first people the Bars deceive are their own new members  
  To ensure a high levels of plausible deniability, to protect the delicate bias and corruption within the private courts using private law of the private guilds of the Bar, an ingenious system was designed from the 16th century- to teach new recruits both the lie and the truth hidden midst a mountain of irrelevance; In other words, to deliberately and consciously deceive new members to the Bar first.  
  Thus new lawyers are taught to reply upon definitions of law such as Blacks, derived from Case Law, which is the private law of the private guild and has nothing to do with the original form of law and real definitions, which still underpin the operation of the court. Hence, normally only a handful of judges are competent at the very definitions of key legal terms, let along the argument of the law and procedure.  
  New lawyers and recruits are then taught for years in law schools the rituals and procedures of law devised by the private guilds of the Bar, without realizing that such rituals and procedures mean nothing compared to the underlying superstructure of trust law, property rights and title and therefore jurisdiction underpinning every single case brought before the court. Hence, when a man or woman is able to demonstrate superior title, contest lesser title used to bring them into the jurisdiction of the private courts and able to demonstrate honor and non-consent, then the court cannot force its private law upon them, nor produce any financial products such as bonds against them without such efforts being wholly flawed.  
  New lawyers and recruits have absolutely no idea that it is Anglo-saxon law, not common law remains the pillars upon which the rotten edifice of the private law of the guilds is based. Nor do many have a clue about the simultaneous operation of trust law and admiralty (maritime) law as the basis of modern commercial law. This is exactly how the private guilds designed their private courts to function, so that only one person may be competent in their courts, the judge and no-one else.  
  While these truths and knowledge present an opportunity to those readers who have not been “image trained” by the Bar into believing an elaborate and wholly fictitious form of law and procedure, such truths and knowledge are an entirely different matter for good men and women who declare themselves legal professionals, even judges. As such knowledge may cause deep anger, resentment even outright hostility to what is read, lest any of it be true and they have been deceived all their careers, all their lives by the system they swore to protect.  
     
  The generic model of the structure of law of a court  
  Let us now consider a generic model of the structure of law operating in a standard criminal or commercial court. Think of it like layers of a cake.  
  The base of the cake remains Anglo-Saxon law and the fundamental principles of honor and that the true law is oral and not paper, that we must approach the law in “good faith”, we must speak the truth, that our “word is our bond” and that only God is the ultimate judge.  
  The middle of the cake is trust law and property law which determines the res, the nature of title and ownership and the rights of the court to administer the matter and make any kinds of decisions against or in favour of you and any other property.  
  The top of the cake and the visible part of the cake begins as case law, or “common law” and may change depending upon whether the judge needs to re-establish honor and control of the case in which case it may change to admiralty/commercial law or change again to talmud/noahide law as the third and final form of the court same generic criminal court.  
  The base of the cake is fundamental for the private guild of the Bar using their private courts to monetize the law, monetize sin and produce commercial products such as bonds, others securities and bailments. If the base of the cake did not exist, then the Bar would have nothing to commercialize. Instead, it needs you to either act in honor and confess, or act in dishonor, declare you delinquent and incompetent and therefore steal your energy claiming powers of attorney.  
  The middle of the cake of law being trust law and property law is essential for the mechanics of commercializing sin, of profiting from crime and producing valid commercial products such as bonds, securities and bailments. If a court does not have clear title of control, then it cannot hear the matter. Thus, trust law is essential for the private court to do its primary job and make money from law, not to deliver fair justice.  
  The top of the cake is usually the only level of the cake that is visible. A normal criminal court begins in Case Law or common law whereby procedure is followed and the defendant agrees by their consent to “contracting” the court to hear the matter and adjudicating through their plea after the offer of charges has been read. However, if the defendant demonstrates some knowledge of the law and contests the authority of the court by either not consenting to contract or not agreeing to procedure, the judge is forbidden to continue in the same form of law as this would be dishonor and affect the commercial goals of the court. So the judge will normally run out of the court and a brief “offer” of recess will be called, only to return with a harder form of law such as admiralty/maritime law.  
  When a judge sits in admiralty/maritime law against a defendant and the defendant has not asserted their specific and narrow rights under admiralty/maritime then they are converted into a “thing” and a judge has the full power for the faulty “cargo” to be placed in a warehouse if it should disrupt their court, through a charge of contempt.  
  Thus, each level of cake plays a fundamental part in stacking the odds against the average defendant. If one layer did not exist, the power of the courts would be greatly reduced.  
     
  Proving these truths against outright denial and arrogant dismissal  
  How then can the existence and truth of this multi-layered “cake” of law within the generic criminal and commercial courts be proven? How can someone who has read this article and notes demonstrate the truth of these assertions against a sea of outright denial and arrogant dismissal of such claims?  
  The short answer is by showing the function of the different forms of law; By encouraging such people to read the whole array of articles and notes contained here before continuing the debate. Why? Because unfortunately, the kind of negative reaction you may receive will often be predicated on complete ignorance of the law, sometimes by legal professionals who have been deliberately deceived for years, sometimes decades.  
  Unless a person is willing to read these notes and consider how all the pieces fit together and why, there is no point wasting your breath in trying to convince anyone or awaken them to competence, midst a sea of ignorance.  
  But is a man or woman is prepared to read and temporarily suspend their previous training, then there is the possibility they can use their own personal experiences as a form of deductive reasoning to test the truth of these words.  
  This is the hope of these documents, to especially help the vast majority of good people who work within the court systems, not realizing why the system the way it is, how to redeem themselves and the law.  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
Copyright © One-Heaven.Org Ab Initio. All Rights Reserved