Print this page
  Within the private laws of the private courts of the private bar guild, the role of notaries and Notarial process is claimed to be highly respected. Many official instruments are not considered valid, unless sealed by a notary. It is why, a number of people who have reviewed the ecclesiastical deed process have asked the legitimate question as to why in the past there has been no Notarial process associated with lodgment?  
  A further question is why are notaries seemingly so important in the process of lodgment of instruments into the private courts or other offices of the Roman system? what makes notary public special? And why does it sometimes appear the same courts will dismiss certain notary public documents and not others?  
  Finally, is the use of notary public the only means by which an instrument can be validated, or are there other means? If so why? Let us begin by reviewing an important concept that needs to now be considered when moving forward with instruments and the court.  
     
  War and Peace  
  There is an old saying that “in war, there are no rules”. This is not strictly true. The Hague Regulations of 1907, The Geneva Convention as well as a number of other instruments such as the Lieber Code (1863) make certain clear rules concerning the conduct of war which all combatants are expected to follow. Of course, there is rarely a war that does not include at least one allegation of a breach of such international treaties and often several accounts of “war crimes”. Yet, what has this got to do with sending Pronouncements of Restitution of our Rights or Ecclesiastical deeds?  
  When you have sent your Ecclesiastical deed and your Live Borne Record and the recipient has not formally responded, then strictly speaking such action is both a grave dishonor and an unwritten declaration of war. In case you think this is somehow an accident, consider that many nations have now passed laws that effectively now automatically class their citizens as enemy combatants and terrorists, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia for example.  
  Now if you choose to follow-up the dishonor with a further contact then you are effectively contracting and agreeing to accept an offer to wage war- the heart of the adversarial system of the courts of the private bar guild.  
  In years past, if a man was dishonored by another, then he held a sacred right to challenge the one who dishonored him to a duel to the death in or to settle the debt and restore his honor. At first this may seem strange, but to the modern world, the concept of honor is largely an antiquated idea-but to the world even one hundred years ago, honor was still considered vitally important- so important that a slur on the honor of another was considered a grave sin.  
  Thus to atone for such a sin again one’s name, a blood atonement or duel to the death was considered equitable in settling such a serious matter- in other words, either the blood of the man dishonored, or the blood of the man who ushered the dishonor would be enough to balance the debt with the credit of blood.  
  As a result, the most common outcome of a duel was an injury, rather than death, as it was considered sufficient that the spilling of blood was enough to pay in full any debt. However, there are many examples where nobles and people of standing were involved murder through duel.  
  In the case of sending your Ecclesiastical deed, once the party who received it dishonors you by not responding in appropriate time, your options of pursuit are limited unless you seek to challenge the person to a duel, or seek the support of a third party, whose honor cannot be compromised by the adversary and they agree to take on pursuing the matter such as a notary, or judge. This is the first and key power of the notary as the independent witness of good standing.  
  This power of the notary is almost 900 years old and originates in definition and source of the word notary from Latin notation meaning “marking, choice, observation, origin and as a censor/levitical judge, stigmatizing / excommunication”. In other words, a notary has the extraordinary power to excommunicate from office any other officer of the Roman system that does not remedy their dishonor through a judgment.  
  While such power may be poorly understood today, no one who holds an office- whether it be a sheriff, governor, judge, clerk, prosecutor, minister etc. can function by law in such an office if they are excommunicated from it. Thus a perfected default judgment of a notary is extremely powerful indeed, even if people holding such Roman positions remain wholly ignorant of its effect. Providing the formalization of such a final judgment is raised to a sufficiently high enough level that is not ignorant in law, such people must be stripped of their duties.  
  Providing the notary has been part of the documented process from the start, when a dishonor occurs, it is then the notary that takes over as the prosecutor for remedy as the independent witness and agent.  
  Unlike the original party, the dishonor of the notary instruments, providing they are issued under correct seal and the instruments do not materially alter or add to the original claims of the person- merely seals the fate of the person or agency that dishonored the process.  
  While a notary possesses such power, it is not the only office to do so. Under the most ancient laws of Mithra and the blood covenant, the laws of blood atonement and blood purification under the sacred scripture of Leviticus, when blood is sacrificed and there are at least two witnesses form the beginning, then the role of the notary can be substituted by the two witnesses, providing they are prepared to affirm and demonstrate their oath, pledge and surety to the truth of their testimony as independent witnesses, not associated by blood.  
     
  The Ecclesiastical Officer  
  As is outlined in the canons of law, an ancient concept of property rights is that all property is ultimately “owned” by the Divine Creator- therefore any instrument used to convey property must by definition have proper ecclesiastical authority as well as the officer or person who seals such an instrument.  
  While the origin of notaries is deliberately vague, their role is without question ecclesiastical in nature, with notaries in England still appointed through a chain of command under the Archbishop of Canterbury.  
  It is this “ecclesiastical” nature that means when a notary seals a valid form of deed, the deed itself is considered perfected in the conveyance of property. This is the second key power of the notary.  
  While a notary is ecclesiastical, it is not the only ecclesiastical office. Under the rules of Leviticus and the origin of the blood atonement and sacrifice that is at the centre of the whole of western law, when a man or woman willingly sacrifices their blood before witnesses in the manner of cleaning and atonement then they are worthy of speaking for an on behalf of the Divine.  
  If the courts deny such a right out of ignorance or deliberate corruption then they deny the very cornerstone of law upon which the whole of Western Christian Law is built, which is the cleaning through blood sacrifice of the world, claimed by the Roman Cult also known as the Vatican.  
     
  The Registrar of the Community and Public Record  
  Under the Roman system, the Registers of property are “all powerful” as the source of occupation, title and claim. Therefore, to legitimately have something entered into the public record is extremely powerful when dealing with matters of dispute. This is the third key power of the notary.  
  A notary public is also a registrar of a public record when the notary declares they are holding documents in due course. As a result, when such documents are presented it is as if they are part of the public record of the case, whether or not the docket reflects their existence yet.  
  This power originates with the origins of public records in England beginning in the 13th Century where Notarial powers were granted to local ministers over parishes to administer the records of the local community, from births, deaths marriages and other events and then to ensure a copy of such records were then forwarded to Keeper of the Rolls for the whole nation.  
  Thus Notary Public has always been a position embedded with the community and essential to the lawfulness of the Public Record by ensuring access to the public record is available at the community level, until in recent decades.  
  When a judge denies the entry of a legitimate notarized instrument into the docket, they commit a crime against the public record and must be reported for such a crime as a notary public when functioning in their capacity as registrar is no different to the registrar of vital statistics or the registrar-general of land records.  
  It is also why many societies have removed notaries from the public and turned such roles over to members of the private bar guild, so such powers can be restricted and not used to compete against corrupt acts within the private courts of the private bar guilds. Such actions have destroyed the credibility and legitimacy of the public record in many nations as a record no longer public as it is no longer literally administered in the community as originally designed.  
  However, any community that exists under a charter, having members has the absolute right to appoint officials within their community, including a notary public to administer the register of community whether such a notary is identified by another state or not. Therefore, when a Ucadian community is formed an a notary appointed then such a role is legitimate to the original intention, form and purpose of the notary.  
     
     
     
Copyright © One-Heaven.Org Ab Initio. All Rights Reserved